Today New York Times theater critic Ben Brantley discloses in a review that he knows Joan
Didion, the author whose memoir and life inspired the play Brantley is reviewing.
Brantley writes, "For the record I have a slight social
acquaintance with Ms.
Didion."
A slight social acquaintance. At moments like these I can't help but think of our own small-town rag, The Chicago Tribune, which printed an 8,000-word series about a Field Museum project without disclosing that managing editor James
O'Shea was married to the Field Museum's publicist, or that president of Tribune publishing Jack Fuller was dating a Field Museum scientist featured in the series.
The Tribune is Dirty. It's as dirty as an El station elevator. I don't know how they can still deny it. The evidence is overwhelming. We object to this sort of thing routinely on this page, because it happens so often with the Cubs. The examples are preserved in print for
ethicists to study in the Tribune autopsies of the future:
Tribune Architecture Critic
Blair Kamin writing an absurdly saccharine review of the new bleachers at Wrigley Field — without disclosing that he is directly invested in that building, not just as an employee of the company that owns it, but as a stockholder. (Because Tribune employees receive Tribune stock in their benefits).
Tribune Business Correspondent
David W. Greising writing that the White
Sox aren't as "big" as the Cubs just days after the
Sox won the World Series — without disclosing that he is directly invested in the baseball market, not just as an employee of the company that owns the Cubs, but as a stockholder.
Chicago Magazine Editor
Richard Babcock steering tourists to Wrigley Field in the magazine's tourism edition — but wait, there's more — and steering those who can't get a ticket to his own office building, the Tribune Store in the Tribune Tower, to buy a Cubs cap to wear while watching the game on television (on
WGN, no doubt) — without disclosing that he is directly invested in the Cubs, not just as an employee of the company that owns them, but as a stockholder.
"But wait!" the suits are howling, in their joint offices in the Tribune Tower, "Chicago Magazine is different from the Chicago Tribune!"
If only it were. It's all one big ethically-compromised monolith of mediocrity. Consider:
WGN reporter
Muriel Clair producing a "news" segment about
Careerbuilder's new ad campaign right before the campaign's Super Bowl debut, without disclosing that both
WGN and
Careerbuilder are owned by the Tribune Company, meaning that Clair is invested in
Careerbuilder, not just as an employee of the company that owns it, but as a stockholder. The unethical report was then repeated on Tribune-owned
CLTV and embedded on the front page of
chicagotribune.com. It's all one big ethically-compromised monolith of mediocrity.
Dirtier than the doormat it lands on.Labels: Chicago Magazine, Chicago Tribune, Tribune Company, WGN