McGrath Spills His Bias
Story lines for '08Now what would cause the sports editor to ask whether the White Sox are "headed back toward irrelevance?" The comment is relevant only to the commentator. The White Sox have never been irrelevant to their fans, and never been irrelevant to Chicago. The fact that attendance drops when the team loses is a sign not of irrelevance but of intelligence. Meanwhile, the Cubs managed to finish in last place in 2006 without being called irrelevant. Where can we find the irrelevance of which the sports editor speaks? Only inside the sports editor. That might explain the biased coverage.
What will the Cubs look like under new ownership? Are the White Sox headed back toward irrelevance? Can the Blackhawks keep their momentum going? Whither Charlie Weis?
Thanks to Brett Ballantini.
Labels: Chicago Tribune
>